Saturday, May 21, 2005

Chaoulli in the NY Times


Dr. Jacques Chaoulli explains his approach to the Supreme Court trial to Osgoode Hall law student Debi Chakrabarty at the 2004 Liberty Summer Seminar.

Today, the New York Times indirectly references my Western Standard cover story from last October (entitled "Freedom Fighter") on Dr. Jacques Chaoulli's case before the Supreme Court. They write:
"A diminutive man who has trouble keeping his wire-rim glasses on straight, Dr. Chaoulli, 53, hardly looks like the "freedom fighter" that Canada's conservative news media have called him. But if he wins his case he will tear up the third rail of the nation's politics and raze what many Canadians consider to be the bedrock of their national identity."
Of course, by "Canada's conservative news media," the New York Times means the Western Standard. Where was the rest of Canada's news media on this story? If they covered it at all (which not all of them did), they buried the lede in A3. Now I'm not saying that the NY Times is a good indicator of what's important to Canadians. Clearly not. All I'm saying is that if you don't have a subscription to the Western Standard, you will miss the stories the Reader's Digest and NY Times will cover three to six months later.

Anyhow, the article, entitled "A Doctor-Lawyer-Gadfly v. Canada's Medical System," is a good account of Chaoulli's struggles and battles with Canada's health care system. That struggle has been temporarily been put on hold, since the Court has not yet issued a ruling in the case. Chaoulli finished his arguments almost a year ago... In my article, scholars that I spoke to expected the decision to come down before the end of last year. Why the delay? Dr. Chaoulli explained to me that he thought the delay is "a good sign."

I suppose he must have told the New York Times the same thing, since they write:
"It has been a year since the Canadian Supreme Court heard the case, a rare delay that is raising eyebrows in legal circles. Scholars studying Dr. Chaoulli's challenge say the court is either badly divided or waiting for the appropriate political moment to release a bombshell..."
A bombshell. Now that would be great news for our health care system.

I've sent Jacques an email asking him to comment on the NY Times story. I'll update this entry with his response.

Meanwhile, last August, if you had attended the Liberty Summer Seminar, you would have had a chance to meet the 'freedom fighter' in person. He explained his travails before the Court, and gave a speech on political parties.

3 Comments:

Anonymous ollivia said...

either way, it's cool that your article was referenced in the NYTimes.

9:37 AM  
Blogger Peter Thurley said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

6:08 PM  
Blogger Michael Cust said...

First, the NY Times doesn't question the US government's lies heading into the Iraq invasion -- which they later apologised for -- now they're referencing some article by a schmuck named Jaworski. That paper's like a used Qu'ran.... it's going down the toilet. ;-)

5:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home